Classroom resource
Classroom discussion ground rules
Use an original discussion agreement, sentence stems and teacher prompts for exploring differing beliefs and values respectfully.
Make a discussion agreement that pupils can use, not just display. Practise asking a clarifying question, representing a position fairly and challenging an idea with a reason.
Download the complete printable pack (PDF). It includes pupil materials and teacher guidance. The complete activity is also below, so the download is optional.
Prepare a thoughtful discussion
Teacher notes.
Learning objective: use a shared discussion process to examine ideas fairly, disagree with reasons and recognise the difference between asking about an argument and demanding private disclosure.
| Planning detail | Suggested use |
|---|---|
| Audience | Approximately ages 11-16; adapt the examples and language. |
| Duration / preparation | 25 minutes / 5 minutes. These are planning estimates. |
| Prerequisites | Pupils can identify the difference between an idea and the person expressing it. |
| Materials | The agreement, practice scenarios and reflection sheet. A display copy is optional. |
Before the discussion
Choose a clear learning question, a fictional example and a way for pupils to pause or contribute in writing. Explain that they do not need to identify their family's beliefs, defend a whole community or disclose a personal experience. A pupil can analyse a published or fictional position throughout.
Treat the agreement as part of your normal classroom practice. Follow the school's behaviour and safeguarding procedures if a discussion raises a concern; do not promise confidentiality to a group. This activity is not a procedure for investigating personal incidents.
Run the activity
- Read the agreement (5 minutes). Ask what each rule makes possible.
- Make it usable (5 minutes). Pairs suggest one practical example or wording improvement. Keep the right to avoid personal disclosure.
- Practise (10 minutes). Use one or more fictional situations and the sentence stems. Ask pupils to improve a response, then explain why it helps.
- Reflect (5 minutes). Record one successful reasoning move and one next step. Agreement with the topic is not the assessment target.
The respectful disagreement guide gives a longer discussion sequence. The teaching guidance helps prepare terminology and representation.
Our discussion agreement
Pupil copy.
We can take an idea seriously without agreeing with it. Use these habits when discussing fictional examples, published views or a classroom question.
| Habit | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| 1. Listen for meaning | Let a contribution finish. Before responding, work out the point being made. |
| 2. Ask before assuming | Ask what a word or example means when it is unclear. Do not invent the speaker's reasons. |
| 3. Represent the idea fairly | Try a short summary that the speaker could recognise before you challenge it. |
| 4. Challenge ideas with reasons | Explain the problem you see in a claim or its support. Avoid insults and labels about the person. |
| 5. Match confidence to support | Distinguish evidence, interpretation and judgement. Say when information is missing. |
| 6. Leave room to change | A better explanation or new information can justify revising a view. Uncertainty is allowed. |
| 7. Respect privacy | Nobody has to reveal personal or family beliefs or speak for a whole group. Use a fictional or published view instead. |
| 8. Pause and repair | If wording is unfair or hurtful, pause, restate it appropriately and return to the question. Ask the teacher for help when needed. |
Make one habit concrete
- Choose one habit. What would someone actually say or do to use it?
Write or discuss your responses to these prompts. The PDF includes blank writing space; no information is submitted to this website.
Respectful discussion does not require agreement. It does require fair treatment of people and an honest account of their ideas.
Practise useful responses
Pupil copy.
Sentence stems to try
- What do you mean by ___?
- Have I understood your point: ___?
- The reason I see it differently is ___.
- Which evidence supports that part of the claim?
- That might follow if ___. Do we know that?
- Could this example have another explanation?
- I am not sure yet because ___.
- I would rather discuss the fictional example than my own beliefs.
Three fictional practice situations
A. The quiet room. One speaker says a shared room should always be silent; another wants a time for conversation. A reply is: 'Only a selfish person would want to talk.' Rewrite it as a challenge to the proposal, with a reason about other room users.
B. The overgeneralisation. A speaker reads one humanist organisation's statement and says: 'Now we know what every non-religious person thinks.' Ask a question that reveals the gap between a source's scope and that conclusion.
C. The personal question. During discussion of a fictional character, someone asks a pupil to tell the class what their family believes. Write a response that preserves participation without requiring an answer about private life.
Partner task
- Choose one situation and write an improved response.
- Explain which discussion habit it uses.
- Ask your partner to suggest a stronger clarification or reason.
- Revise your response and identify what changed.
A useful test
Does your response make the idea clearer or better supported? A polite phrase that still misrepresents a position needs revision.
Facilitate and assess the practice
Teacher response guide.
Possible responses
A: 'I understand that you want time to talk. I worry that readers may lose concentration. Could the room have separate quiet and discussion times?' This represents the proposal and raises a consequence. It does not prove that this compromise is best; ask whether the timetable and space make it workable.
B: 'Does that statement describe the organisation's position, every member's position, or everyone without a religion?' Follow with: 'What additional evidence would you need for the wider claim?' A group's self-description has a specific scope.
C: 'We can work with the fictional character; nobody needs to explain their family beliefs.' Invite a question about the supplied text instead. Do not ask the pupil to justify why they prefer privacy.
Facilitator prompt cards
| When you notice... | A prompt to use |
|---|---|
| A vague word | What might that word mean here? Can we agree a working meaning? |
| An inaccurate summary | Let's restate the position before evaluating it. What did the source actually say? |
| A bare assertion | What reason would help someone assess that claim? |
| An identity-based assumption | What does the supplied information establish, and what are we adding? |
| Pressure to disclose | Keep the task on the fictional or published position. A personal answer is not required. |
| An insult or harmful generalisation | Pause. That wording targets a person or group. Restate the relevant idea fairly, or move back to the shared text. |
Look for progress
Assess whether a pupil can clarify a term, give a fair summary, supply a relevant reason and notice a limit. A quiet written response can show these just as clearly as speaking first. Avoid scoring confidence, identity or agreement as if they were understanding.
For support, model one stem and allow a written rehearsal. For extension, ask pupils to improve a courteous but logically weak reply. Use smaller groups, extra thinking time or written contributions where appropriate.
Reflect on the discussion
Pupil reflection and use notes.
- One idea I can now state more fairly:
- A question or reason that helped the discussion:
- Something still uncertain, and what would help us examine it:
- A discussion habit I will practise next time:
Write or discuss your responses to these prompts. The PDF includes blank writing space; no information is submitted to this website.
Source and use notes
The agreement, stems and examples are original teaching aids. Hwb and the RE Council give background on enquiry and diverse perspectives; their inclusion is not approval of this resource. The IPO source explains limits on reuse of third-party material.
All classroom examples and figures in this pack are original fiction, not findings from a study or accounts of real pupils. Timings are planning estimates. Teachers should adapt the material to their learners and curriculum.
You may print, copy and adapt original YAH for Schools material for teaching and personal study with attribution. Identify adaptations. This permission excludes third-party material.
Version 1.0. Prepared 3 November 2026. The complete text is also available as an HTML resource, which can be enlarged and read with assistive technology.
Follow the evidence
Sources and further reading
- Welsh Government Hwb: Humanities, designing your curriculum Checked 3 November 2026
- RE Council: Religion and Worldviews Approach - FAQs (professional guidance) Checked 3 November 2026
- Intellectual Property Office: Exceptions to copyright Checked 3 November 2026